Mesenteric Ischemia in Patients with Coronavirus 2019: A Scoping Review.

Background: Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is a systemic disease associated with severe gastrointestinal complications including life-threatening mesenteric ischemia. We sought to review and summarize the currently available literature on the presentation, management, and outcomes of mesenteric ischemia in patients with COVID-19. Patients and Methods: The PubMed database was searched to identify studies published between January 2020 and January 2021 that reported one or more adult (≥18 years) patients with COVID-19 who developed mesenteric ischemia during hospitalization. The demographic characteristics, clinical and imaging findings, management, and outcomes of patients from each study were extracted and summarized. Results: A total of 35 articles reporting on 61 patients with COVID-19 with mesenteric ischemia met the eligibility and were included in our study. The mean age was 60 (±15.9) years, and 53% of patients were male. Imaging findings of these patients included mesenteric arterial or venous thromboembolism, followed by signs of mesenteric ischemia. Sixty-seven percent of patients were taken to the operating room for an exploratory laparotomy and bowel resection and 21% were managed conservatively. The terminal ileum was the most commonly involved area of necrosis (26%). The mortality rate of patients with COVID-19 with mesenteric ischemia was 33%, and the most common cause of death was multiorgan failure or refractory septic shock. Twenty-seven percent of patients managed operatively died during the post-operative period. Conclusions: Mesenteric ischemia in patients with COVID-19 is a devastating complication associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Further efforts should focus on developing strategies for early recognition and management.

Hepatopancreatobiliary surgery in a Mexican social security hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Data on hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery and COVID-19 are scarce. The objective of the study was to determine the outcomes HPB procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic and compare results to the previous year. METHODS: IRB approved study of HPB procedures (April, 2020-November, 2020). Primary endpoints: Thirty-day surgical morbidity/mortality, including COVID-19 infection. Secondary endpoints: Comparison between 2019 and 2020 procedures. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were included. In 2020, HPB procedures decreased 31.6%. About 60% developed complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade III, 20%). Three patients developed post-operative COVID-19 infection (two deaths: 66% COVID-19 mortality). When compared to the previous year, there were more emergency cases, ventilator-assisted patients (p < 0.05) and pre-operative acute renal failure (p = 0.06). Clavien-Dindo complication grades were higher in 2020. Thirty-day mortality was also higher (16% vs. 5.6%). CONCLUSION: HPB surgical activity was negatively influenced by COVID-19 on 30-day morbidity/mortality. HPB patients who developed post-operative COVID-19 infection had a complicated course with significant mortality.

OBJETIVO: Los datos sobre cirugía hepatopancreatobiliar (HPB) y COVID-19 son escasos. El objetivo del estudio fue determinar los resultados de procedimientos de HPB durante la pandemia COVID-19 y comparar resultados con el año anterior. MATERIAL-MÉTODOS: Estudio de procedimientos HPB aprobado por el IRB (04/2020-11/2020). Criterios de valoración principales: morbilidad/mortalidad quirúrgica a los 30 días, incluida la infección por COVID-19. Criterios de valoración secundarios: comparación entre los procedimientos de 2019 y 2020. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 25 pacientes. En 2020, los procedimientos de HPB disminuyeron 31.6%. El 60% desarrolló complicaciones (grado III de Clavien-Dindo, 20%). 3 pacientes desarrollaron infección posoperatoria por COVID-19, (2 muertes: 66% de mortalidad por COVID-19). En comparación con el año anterior, hubo más casos de emergencia, pacientes asistidos por ventilador (p < 0.05) e insuficiencia renal aguda preoperatoria (p = 0.06). Los grados de complicación de Clavien-Dindo fueron más altos en 2020. La mortalidad a 30 días también fue más alta (16% frente a 5.6%). CONCLUSIÓN: La actividad quirúrgica de HPB fue influenciada negativamente por COVID-19 en la morbilidad/mortalidad a 30 días. Los pacientes con HPB que desarrollaron infección posoperatoria por COVID-19 tuvieron un curso complicado con una mortalidad significativa.

Emergency Surgery for Colon Diseases in Elderly Patients-Analysis of Complications, and Postoperative Course.

Background and Objectives: Colon diseases can turn in a clinical emergency with the onset of some important complications. Some critical conditions are more common in aged patients because they are frailer. The aim of this study is to examine patients over 80 years of age who are undergoing emergency colorectal surgery, and evaluating the aspects associated with post-operative complications and other problems in the short term. Methods: From November 2020 to February 2022, we included 32 consecutive patients older than 80 undergoing emergency surgery due to colon diseases. We collected and analysed all demographic and operative data, and then applied CR-POSSUM score and correlated this with postoperative hospital stay and the onset of postoperative complications according to the Clavien Dindo classification. Results: Postoperative factors were selectively evaluated based on the clinical scenario and different colic pathologies. There were no statistically significant differences, in terms of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, reoperation rate and 30-day mortality. The number of cases of blood transfusions was significant and was more numerous in cases of intestinal perforation and bleeding cases. The value of the Operative Severity Score in bowel perforations was significantly higher. Conclusions: The use of a score to stratify the risk is a useful tool, especially in elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery. The CR-POSSUM score was important for predicting morbidity in our study. Emergency manifestations of colon diseases in the elderly show higher morbidity and mortality rates. The effect of age on outcome is a concept that needs to be emphasized, so further investigation is needed.

[Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on robotic visceral surgery in Germany]. / Auswirkungen der COVID-19-Pandemie auf die robotische Viszeralchirurgie in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: Robotic procedures are gaining more and more importance in visceral surgery and seem to develop into an indispensable tool in minimally invasive visceral surgery. In 2020 the COVID-19 pandemic caused unexpected changes in daily surgical routines with still ongoing challenges. We evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on robotic visceral procedures and the associated training provided in Germany. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a thorough evaluation of German hospitals and identified 89 surgical departments performing robotic visceral procedures. After extensive topic-related literature search an online questionnaire was developed. It included 35 questions referring to all relevant topics on robotic surgery, such as training programs and influence of the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey was sent via email three times to each department. Descriptive and subgroup analysis were performed. RESULTS: We reported a response to our questionnaire from 22 (24.7%) surgical departments and17 questionnaires were analyzable. The vast majority of them weresurgical departments of university hospitals (58.8%), 17.6% maximum care clinics and 23.5% main care clinics. Robotic procedures were performed for the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGI 88.2%), the hepatopancreaticobiliary system (HPB 82.4%), in the colorectal region (94.1%) and for hernias (35.3%). The relative proportion of robotic operations in comparison to all visceral procedures was between 0.3% and 15.4%. The average conversion rate was 4.6 ± 3.2% referring to 2020. All participating clinics used the robotic DaVinci® system (Intuitive Surgical Inc., CA, USA). In summary 22 robotic systems were used mainly in an interdisciplinary setting (82.4%). For teaching purposes, 7 departments (41.2%) provided a second robotic console. On average 13.2 ± 6.5% of surgeons per clinic were involved in robotic procedures. Defined operating room (OR) teams (82.4%) consisted of consultants, specialists and residents. Team training for surgeons and OR nurses was mainly (52.9%) based on clinic-specific programs. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic the number of robotic procedures decreased in 70.0% of the participating departments compared to 2019 with the highest decline reported during the second quarter of 2020 (64.7%). Referring to this, staff shortage of non-surgical disciplines (anesthesiologists 35.3%, OR nurses 35.3%, intensive care medics 17.6%), COVID-19-specific regulations (58.8%) and limited capacities of intensive and intermediate care (47.1%) were specified as underlying causes. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, caused by a decline in numbers of robotic procedures, robotic training was paused completely in assistance at the operating table in 23.5% and at the second console in 42.9%. CONCLUSION: Robotic visceral surgery is already implemented with a broad spectrum of operations in many German clinics of different care levels; however, the relative proportion of robotic procedures is low, when compared to the overall caseload of each clinic. Training concepts are heterogeneous and focused on experts. In surgeons with growing experience in robotic surgery, conversion rates are recorded to be very low. There was a negative impact on robotic case numbers and training provided in 2020 caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, a further endorsement of robotic training programs and an improvement of training designs seem to be essential tools in order to enforce robotic procedures in visceral surgery.

A rare case report of short bowel anastomosis after acute mesenteric ischaemia in Covid-19 postive patient.

Acute mesenteric ischaemia is one of the serious abdominal surgical emergency, which has got very high morbidity and mortality. During the pandemic of COVID-19, besides respiratory complications, the virus was causing venous and arterial thromboembolism that can lead to acute mesenteric ischaemia in otherwise healthy individuals. Early diagnosis and suitable surgical procedures are the key to the better outcome of this disease. Surgical resection of gangrenous gut, leaving healthy gut is an important step of this operation. Leaving less than 200 cm of small intestine leads to short bowel syndrome which has got its own complication. This case report is on a healthy COVID-19 positive patient who presented with acute mesenteric ischaemia. After surgical resection only 1.5 feet small bowel (60 cm) was left behind and anastomosis was done with healthy transverse colon. He was later managed for complications of small bowel syndrome and was discharged successfully with dietary modifications.

Learning-by-teaching coming into play as a reliable trick for lower GI procedures: a learning curve analysis in 13,210 operative logs including the COVID-19 era.

After suspecting a plunge in the operative case logs in our clinic, we wanted to explore the COVID-19 impact on surgical training side of the lower gastrointestinal procedures to raise awareness of the possible cracks in the pillars of general surgery residency. Comparing the coronavirus impact to previous years starting from 2014, we examined the procedures of our residents for their roles in the operating room. We performed interrupted time-series analyses to get a sense of the magnitude and then used a new index to identify the trend of change in operator-to-first assistant rate of experience and searched for signs of learning-by-teaching motives. In total, 13,210 operative logs of residents were included; of procedures, 3483 (41%) were emergency. Both overall resident participations and learning-by-teaching dropped during first 3 months, followed by a rebound. The overall operator-to-first assistant rate of experience was 1.06 before and 0.86 after. Emergency procedures, obstruction, perforation, enterostomy closure, appendix, colon, anus and minimally invasive procedures, and COVID-19 were associated with learning-by-teaching (OR and 95% Cl were; 2.20, 1.76-2.75; 0.56, 0.36-0.85; 0.50, 0.38-0.67; 2.29, 1.44-3.63; 11.09, 8.33-14.75; 1.75, 1.32-2.32; 2.56, 2.03-3.22; 0.80, 0.65-0.99 and 1.93, 1.54-2.42, respectively) (p < 0.05). The study provided insights into a vastly underrated surgical education subject: learning-by-teaching. The training index introduced here was a valuable learning curve instrument that has the capacity of comparing different training parameters or different residency programs. The surge in learning-by-teaching after the pandemic was interpreted as a reflex, processing the teaching as a training tool.

Is Preoperative Spirometry Necessary for Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery?

BACKGROUND/AIM: The significance of spirometry as preoperative risk assessment for gastrointestinal surgery has been controversial. At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, preoperative spirometry was temporarily suspended in our institute. This study was aimed to investigate the necessity of spirometry for gastrointestinal cancer surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared short-term postoperative outcomes between 318 patients who underwent surgery for colorectal or gastric cancer with (Spirometry group; n=272) or without spirometry (Non-spirometry group; n=46). RESULTS: Respiratory functional disorders were detected in 77 (28.3%) patients in the Spirometry group. No significant differences were noted in complications, including pneumonia, or the length of hospital stay between the two groups. An advanced age, male sex, comorbidities with respiratory diseases, and a smoking history significantly correlated with abnormal results in spirometry. CONCLUSION: Preoperative spirometry may be substituted with other clinical factors in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

How has the COVID-19 pandemic affected gastrointestinal surgery for malignancies and surgical infections?

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected infection control and prevention measures. We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on postoperative infections and infection control measures in patients underwent gastrointestinal surgery for malignancies. We retrospectively evaluated changes in clinicopathological features, frequency of alcohol-based hand sanitizer use, frequency of postoperative complications, and microbial findings among our patients in February-May in 2019 (Control group) and 2020 (Pandemic group), respectively. Surgical resection in pathological stage III or IV patients was more frequently performed in the Pandemic group than in the Control group (P = 0.02). The total length of hospitalization and preoperative hospitalization was significantly shorter in the Pandemic group (P = 0.01 and P = 0.008, respectively). During the pandemic, hand sanitizer was used by a patients for an average of 14.9±3.0 times/day during the pandemic as opposed to 9.6±3.0 times/day in 2019 (p<0.0001). Superficial surgical site infection and infectious colitis occurred less frequently during the pandemic (P = 0.04 and P = 0.0002, respectively). In Pandemic group, Enterobacter, Haemophilus, and Candida were significantly decreased in microbiological cultures (P < 0.05, P < 0.05, P = 0.02, respectively) compared with Control group. Furthermore, a significant decrease in Streptococcus from drainage cultures was observed in the Pandemic group (P < 0.05). During the COVID-19 pandemic, a decrease in nosocomial infections was observed in the presence of an increase in alcohol-based hand sanitizer use.

iColon, a patient-focused mobile application for perioperative care in colorectal surgery: an observational, real-world study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol provides optimised care guidelines for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. To ensure high compliance with active ERAS elements, patients must be educated to actively participate in the perioperative care pathway. Mobile health is a rapidly expanding area of the digital health sector that is effective in educating and engaging patients during follow-up. iColon is a mobile application designed by the Operative Unit of General Surgery of IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital of Negrar of Valpolicella, which is specifically targeted at patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. iColon is organised into ERAS phases, and it provides real-time feedback to surgeons about a patient's adherence to perioperative active ERAS elements. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We hypothesise that by providing a patient-focused mobile application, compliance with active ERAS elements could be improved.The first coprimary objective is to build patient confidence in using the mobile application, iColon, during perioperative care. The second coprimary objective is to establish patient compliance with active ERAS elements.Secondary objectives include examining: length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, postoperative complications and patient satisfaction of received care.This study is a prospective observational real-world study of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery who are following the ERAS protocol and using iColon during perioperative periods between September 2020 and December 2022.By educating and engaging patients in the ERAS protocol, the mobile application, iColon, should stimulate patients to be more proactive in managing their healthcare by complying more closely with active ERAS elements. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the local Ethics Committee with the protocol number 29219 of 25 May 2020. The results will be actively disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and various community engagement activities.

Analysis of outcomes of emergency general and gastrointestinal surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Few surgical studies have provided adjusted comparative postoperative outcome data among contemporary patients with and without COVID-19 infection and patients treated before the pandemic. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of performing emergency surgery in patients with concomitant COVID-19 infection. METHODS: Patients who underwent emergency general and gastrointestinal surgery from March to June 2020, and from March to June 2019 in 25 Spanish hospitals were included in a retrospective study (COVID-CIR). The main outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and failure to rescue (mortality among patients who developed complications). Propensity score-matched comparisons were performed between patients who were positive and those who were negative for COVID-19; and between COVID-19-negative cohorts before and during the pandemic. RESULTS: Some 5307 patients were included in the study (183 COVID-19-positive and 2132 COVID-19-negative during pandemic; 2992 treated before pandemic). During the pandemic, patients with COVID-19 infection had greater 30-day mortality than those without (12.6 versus 4.6 per cent), but this difference was not statistically significant after propensity score matching (odds ratio (OR) 1.58, 95 per cent c.i. 0.88 to 2.74). Those positive for COVID-19 had more complications (41.5 versus 23.9 per cent; OR 1.61, 1.11 to 2.33) and a higher likelihood of failure to rescue (30.3 versus 19.3 per cent; OR 1.10, 0.57 to 2.12). Patients who were negative for COVID-19 during the pandemic had similar rates of 30-day mortality (4.6 versus 3.2 per cent; OR 1.35, 0.98 to 1.86) and complications (23.9 versus 25.2 per cent; OR 0.89, 0.77 to 1.02), but a greater likelihood of failure to rescue (19.3 versus 12.9 per cent; OR 1.56, 95 per cent 1.10 to 2.19) than prepandemic controls. CONCLUSION: Patients with COVID-19 infection undergoing emergency general and gastrointestinal surgery had worse postoperative outcomes than contemporary patients without COVID-19. COVID-19-negative patients operated on during the COVID-19 pandemic had a likelihood of greater failure-to-rescue than prepandemic controls.

Surgical treatment of gastrointestinal tumors in a COVID-19 pandemic hospital: Can open versus minimally invasive surgery be safely performed?

PURPOSE: In order for patients with gastrointestinal cancer not to suffer the consequences of delayed treatment, they should be operated on in pandemic hospitals under adequate conditions. We aimed to discuss the outcomes of our gastrointestinal cancer surgery patients and to present our patient management recommendations to resume operative treatment during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic while taking into account hospital facilities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 129 gastrointestinal cancer patients who underwent surgery between March 2020 and May 2021 in the gastrointestinal surgery clinic of our hospital, which was assigned as a pandemic hospital in March 2020. Patients' demographic characteristics and preoperative and postoperative findings were recorded. RESULTS: Among the patients, 42.6% (n = 55) were female and 57.3% (n = 74) were male. The mean age was 61.89 ± 3.4 years. The primary tumor organs were the stomach 37.2% (n = 48), pancreas 36.4% (n = 47), rectum 11.6% (n = 15), colon 8.5% (n = 11), and esophagus 6.2% (n = 8). The patients were treated with open (75.2%, n = 97) or minimally invasive surgery (24.8%, n = 32; laparoscopic 11.6%, n = 15; robotic 13.2%, n = 17). Eight patients tested positive for COVID-19 before surgery. No patients developed COVID-19 during postoperative intensive care or after being moved to the floor unit. There was no COVID-19-related morbidity or mortality. CONCLUSION: Failure to treat gastrointestinal cancer patients during the pandemic may result in undesirable consequences, such as stage shift and mortality. Cancer patients can be treated safely with conventional and minimally invasive surgery guided by current recommendations and experience.